-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
forkjoin marbel diagram is wrong. #5416
Comments
@cartant is anyone assigned for this ? |
@sijusamson No, but I doubt this can be fixed ATM because the marble diagram generation is currently being changed. |
So do i need to work on this ? |
@sijusamson see the links in this comment and the PR in which it was made. The marble diagram generation is being completely replaced, so I don't think there's anything that you can do, ATM. However, if you want to acquaint yourself with Swirly - see #5019 - it's highly likely that you'll be able to help with the generation of the new diagrams soon, if that's something you'd be interested in. If that is the case, keep an eye on #5422. |
Closing as fixed in #4940. |
in forkJoin doc, the documentation says that the output observable emmits values in the same order of the input observables.
but in the attached marbel diagram, it dosen't.
the output value is (e ,4 ,j)
i.e: values emitted by obs1, obs3, obs2 (not obs1, obs2, obs3)
the expected result is: (e, j, 4) and not (e, 4, j)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: