Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treatment of multiple (conflicting) rules needs fixing #3

Open
rwest opened this issue Jul 15, 2011 · 1 comment
Open

treatment of multiple (conflicting) rules needs fixing #3

rwest opened this issue Jul 15, 2011 · 1 comment

Comments

@rwest
Copy link
Member

rwest commented Jul 15, 2011

In RMG-java it looks at the "rank" column (I think) and/or chooses the first (or last?). Perhaps a design decision is needed here.

nyee added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2017
-*3 subtree was overspecified for many groups. I have removed many of these groups and reduced the rest. This applies to all groups below CdsJ in that subtree.
-Changed names in rules accordingly
-To accommodate rule #3, I have created a new group which further specifies atomtype along the backbone, as is the only reasonable interpreation of the author's intent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant