Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assess if we want to develop a data versioning strategy for raw indices data #22

Open
jdhoffa opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
ADO Maintenance Day! documentation feature a feature request or enhancement priority upkeep maintenance, infrastructure, and similar

Comments

@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member

jdhoffa commented Apr 11, 2023

And also potentially for processed indices data.

Relates to #21 (comment)

AB#9893

@jdhoffa
Copy link
Member Author

jdhoffa commented Apr 11, 2023

Relevant comment:

This looks good to me.
However, there is one consideration we should make, and that is if we want this to run the scraping every time we run this workflow.

This workflow achieves three main steps

Scraping the raw indices
Preparing those indices as PACTA input
Running PACTA on them
I can envision a situation where we may want to only run the last step (for example, if we fix a bug in PACTA. We may want to update the indices output just to include the bugfix, but not necessarily be fussed about pulling the indices fresh again).

What do you think?

@jdhoffa jdhoffa added documentation feature a feature request or enhancement upkeep maintenance, infrastructure, and similar ADO Maintenance Day! labels Feb 7, 2024
@jdhoffa jdhoffa self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@jdhoffa jdhoffa added ADO Maintenance Day! and removed ADO Maintenance Day! labels Feb 19, 2024
@jdhoffa jdhoffa removed their assignment Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ADO Maintenance Day! documentation feature a feature request or enhancement priority upkeep maintenance, infrastructure, and similar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant