Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dealing With Failures at Scale using cacheing #124

Open
1 task
masonmenges opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

Dealing With Failures at Scale using cacheing #124

masonmenges opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@masonmenges
Copy link

💻

  • Would you like to work on this feature?

What problem are you trying to solve?

When implementing large workflows at scale we often only want failed tasks to be re-run in the event of a failure as this preserves resources for other jobs in the infrastructure where our workflows are running.

Describe the solution you'd like

Implementing cacheing on tasks and/or using results storage can help alleviate the need to re-run successful tasks in large workflows (caching docs). It would be helpful for users to have a template when implementing this for large workloads, in the same vein including reporting/logging for where the tasks may be failing and why.

Results (TBD)(currently uses local storage)

1.0 potential reference: https://discourse.prefect.io/t/how-to-resume-mapped-task-runs-from-failure-at-scale-or-limit-the-amount-of-allowed-runs-that-may-fail/715

Describe alternatives you've considered

None at the moment.

Documentation, Adoption, Migration Strategy

No response

@serinamarie serinamarie added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants