Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AZ 2022 Joint 200K wage 40K mortgage 3 deps #176

Open
feenberg opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

AZ 2022 Joint 200K wage 40K mortgage 3 deps #176

feenberg opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@feenberg
Copy link

feenberg commented Jan 3, 2025

AZ 2022 Joint 200K wage 40K mortgage 3 deps

See

http://taxsim.nber.org/out2psl/az

Emulator shows State Taxable Income of $152,449 while TaxAct reports $157,900.

@noman404
Copy link
Collaborator

noman404 commented Jan 5, 2025

- name: 194-AZ.yaml
  absolute_error_margin: 2
  period: 2022
  input:
    people:
      person1:
        age: 70
        employment_income: 200000
        ssi: 0
        state_supplement: 0
        wic: 0
        deductible_mortgage_interest: 40000
      person2:
        age: 40
        employment_income: 0
        ssi: 0
        state_supplement: 0
        wic: 0
        deductible_mortgage_interest: 0
      person3:
        age: 10
        employment_income: 0
        ssi: 0
        state_supplement: 0
        wic: 0
        deductible_mortgage_interest: 0
      person4:
        age: 10
        employment_income: 0
        ssi: 0
        state_supplement: 0
        wic: 0
        deductible_mortgage_interest: 0
      person5:
        age: 10
        employment_income: 0
        ssi: 0
        state_supplement: 0
        wic: 0
        deductible_mortgage_interest: 0
    tax_units:
      tax_unit:
        members: [person1, person2, person3, person4, person5]
        tax_unit_childcare_expenses: 0
        premium_tax_credit: 0
        local_income_tax: 0
        state_sales_tax: 0
    spm_units:
      spm_unit:
        members: [person1, person2, person3, person4, person5]
        snap: 0
        tanf: 0
    households:
      household:
        members: [person1, person2, person3, person4, person5]
        state_fips: 4
  output:
    income_tax: 19234.8
    az_income_tax: 3996.57
    employee_social_security_tax: 12014
    employee_medicare_tax: 2900
    additional_medicare_tax: 2900
    taxsim_tfica: 12014
    adjusted_gross_income: 200000
    tax_unit_taxable_unemployment_compensation: 0
    tax_unit_taxable_social_security: 0
    standard_deduction: 27300
    exemptions: 0
    taxable_income_deductions_if_itemizing: 45450.9
    taxable_income: 154549
    income_tax_main_rates: 25234.8
    ctc: 6000
    refundable_ctc: 0
    cdcc: 0
    eitc: 0
    amt_income: 160000
    alternative_minimum_tax: 0
    capital_gains_tax: 25234.8
    household_net_income: 164755
    az_agi: 197900
    az_standard_deduction: 25900
    az_itemized_deductions: 45450.9
    az_taxable_income: 152449
    az_property_tax_credit: 0
    az_cdcc: 0
    az_eitc: 0
    state_non_refundable_credits: 300
    state_refundable_credits: 300
    qualified_business_income_deduction: 0
    net_investment_income_tax: 0
    recovery_rebate_credit: 0

@noman404 noman404 added the question Further information is requested label Jan 5, 2025
@PavelMakarchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@noman404 in this test we have the mortgage deduction allocated just to the head of the household (which is correct), not sure what the difference is to #193

@PavelMakarchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@feenberg the difference seems to the the $5,451 state and local tax deduction. The SALT deduction is reflected on the Arizona Form 140 Schedule A

Let me know if misread anything here

@PavelMakarchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

PavelMakarchuk commented Jan 5, 2025

@feenberg the difference seems to the the $5,451 state and local tax deduction. The SALT deduction is reflected on the Arizona Form 140 Schedule A

Let me know if misread anything here

This seems to be a persistent cause of the differences due to the State and Local tax deduction not being included in the TaxAct calculations we would need to merge PR #171 to get more accurate results for itemizing test cases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants