You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, say I want to take an Alabama state income tax bracket and run the mark_as_modified() method upon it. It appears that gov.states.al.tax.income.rates[1] doesn't recognize gov.states.al.tax.income.rates as its parent, thereby preventing mark_as_modified() from recursing further up the tree.
The downstream impact of this is that, if I wanted to use cached values while calculating (assuming all other current issues we have with state-level caching were gone), the simulation wouldn't correctly recurse all the way to gov.states, thereby giving an erroneous output for household_state_income_tax.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For example, say I want to take an Alabama state income tax bracket and run the
mark_as_modified()
method upon it. It appears thatgov.states.al.tax.income.rates[1]
doesn't recognizegov.states.al.tax.income.rates
as itsparent
, thereby preventingmark_as_modified()
from recursing further up the tree.The downstream impact of this is that, if I wanted to use cached values while calculating (assuming all other current issues we have with state-level caching were gone), the simulation wouldn't correctly recurse all the way to
gov.states
, thereby giving an erroneous output forhousehold_state_income_tax
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: