You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since gif.js hasn't seen major updates in its codebase for a while, its efficiency is to be desired. Like a greek god, ffmpeg.wasm rises from the ashes as the singular answer to the shrieking souls longing for an overkill multi-purpose client-side video processor.
Now it also supports GIFs.
Do a feasibility study. Is it any more efficient at encoding than gif.js?
Can we implement better compression without compromising performance too much? The smaller the GIF, the merrier.
Resolve licensing questions
Implement ffmpeg.wasm in the GIF generator. The user should use Shadis without the generator logic loaded on default. Both the generation logic and the wasm has to be loaded asynchronously and solely on demand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since gif.js hasn't seen major updates in its codebase for a while, its efficiency is to be desired. Like a greek god, ffmpeg.wasm rises from the ashes as the singular answer to the shrieking souls longing for an overkill multi-purpose client-side video processor.
Now it also supports GIFs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: