Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lifton vs Liftoff #76

Open
annabel-NZ opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Lifton vs Liftoff #76

annabel-NZ opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion needed Further discussion is needed enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@annabel-NZ
Copy link

Description of feature

Hi Jason,
This workflow looks great and I hope to try it out soon.
If you haven't already considered it, you might want to take a look at incorporating this tool as an alternative/replacement for LiftOff.
I particularly like the feature it has to annotate the identity/variation type relative to the source annotation.
https://github.com/Kuanhao-Chao/LiftOn
Kua-Hao Chao, Jakob M. Heinz, Celine Hoh, Alan Mao, Alaina Shumate, Mihaela Pertea, and Steven L. Salzberg. "Combining DNA and protein alignments to improve genome annotation with LiftOn." bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.16.593026, 2024.

@annabel-NZ annabel-NZ added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 28, 2024
@GallVp GallVp self-assigned this Oct 28, 2024
@GallVp
Copy link
Member

GallVp commented Oct 28, 2024

Hello @annabel-NZ

Thank you for the suggestion. We have considered it and will incorporate in a future release.

@GallVp GallVp added this to the backlog milestone Oct 28, 2024
@GallVp GallVp added the discussion needed Further discussion is needed label Oct 28, 2024
@GallVp GallVp removed their assignment Nov 20, 2024
@GallVp GallVp removed this from the backlog milestone Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion needed Further discussion is needed enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants