Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rounding Safe Reverse McCormick Relaxations #24

Open
mewilhel opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Rounding Safe Reverse McCormick Relaxations #24

mewilhel opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mewilhel
Copy link
Member

Our basic MC objects are not numerically safe. As a consequence, the reverse McCormick relaxations can produce erroneous results. This was a noted issue in the original Wechsung paper. A solution to this consists of defining a corrected rounded relaxation types NSSafe, MVSafe, DiffSafe in McCormick then using these to define backwards passes (that said, this is a lot of work, so we'll need to kick this down the rado to McCormick 2.0 or 3.0).

@mewilhel mewilhel added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant