You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There have been different interpretations of how parameter bounds and parameter priors interact. The current specifications don't address that explicitly.
My interpretation would be that if a prior distribution exceeds the bounds, the bounds truncate the prior and the probability density needs to be re-scaled accordingly.
The alternative would be, that the prior distribution is not affected by the parameter bounds. This seems weird, since if once really believes that those parameter values outside the bounds have a non-zero probability, then the bounds should have been chosen wider in the first place.
I'd be happy to get other's opinions on that matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There have been different interpretations of how parameter bounds and parameter priors interact. The current specifications don't address that explicitly.
My interpretation would be that if a prior distribution exceeds the bounds, the bounds truncate the prior and the probability density needs to be re-scaled accordingly.
The alternative would be, that the prior distribution is not affected by the parameter bounds. This seems weird, since if once really believes that those parameter values outside the bounds have a non-zero probability, then the bounds should have been chosen wider in the first place.
I'd be happy to get other's opinions on that matter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: