Better control on the inputs of robustness_categories
#300
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
robustness_categories
#300
Addressing a Problem?
Currently (as of #299), the output of
robustness_fractions
is given directly torobustness_categories
. This means that the function will usechanged
andagree
to output the agreement on the direction (strong/no change/conflicting), but not the actual direction itself.Potential Solution
Instead of
agree
, I think that sendingagree_positive
would accomplish what I need. This could be an argument somewhere, either here inxscen
or inxclim
.Additional context
I need to be able to compute the "Direction" categories used in the Hydroclimatic Atlas, with a potential 6th category for "Conflicting signals": https://cehq.gouv.qc.ca/atlas-hydroclimatique/carte-indicateurs/index.htm
Contribution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: