You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know that (because of the number of nodes) we can't fetch the tree deeper than a few levels. But it does make it hard to navigate. It would be nice to have a tree-of-life API method that returns a deeper tree if the tree (a few levels tipward) is not larger than some number X nodes.
This might need to be a pair of treemachine and opentree/webapp issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
is there some way to leverage species or taxon popularity to solve this problem (we're working with OneZoom to design a popularity service)? That is, each taxon or species can be assigned a popularity based on sequences in GenBank or wikispecies hits or whatever. > 99.99% of the 2M taxa in OT are unfamiliar to the typical user. Users (other than experts on a particular taxon) rely on familiar taxa to serve as landmarks-- it's how they make sense of the tree.
I know that (because of the number of nodes) we can't fetch the tree deeper than a few levels. But it does make it hard to navigate. It would be nice to have a tree-of-life API method that returns a deeper tree if the tree (a few levels tipward) is not larger than some number X nodes.
This might need to be a pair of treemachine and opentree/webapp issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: