Description of the issue

The relation has model is defined as: inverse of is-model-of.
The actually defined inverse relation of has model is called has role in modeling.

Both of these relations are imported from the RO.
After checking the most recent version, it seems that this is actually an issue that is still in the RO and has been imported into the OEO.

Ideas of solution

After discussing this inconsistency with @stap-m, we came to the concluson, that we should just add a comment to the relation that points out the actual definition.

Workflow checklist

• I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
• I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
• The goal of this ontology is clear to me

I am aware that

• every entry in the ontology should have a definition
• classes should arise from concepts rather than from words