Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Module hiero-base miss tests for functionality of AccountClientImpl.createAccount #107

Open
11 tasks
hendrikebbers opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
11 tasks
Labels
good first issue candidate Label for issues that should be labeled by 'good first issue' but missing a good documentation

Comments

@hendrikebbers
Copy link
Member

hendrikebbers commented Nov 15, 2024

🆕🐥 First Timers Only

This issue is reserved for people who have never contributed to this project or any open source project in general.
We know that creating a pull request (PR) is a major barrier for new contributors.
The goal of this issue and all other issues labeled by 'good first issue' is to help you make your first contribution.

👾 Description of the issue

In the hiero-base module, the AccountClientImpl class implements the createAccount method, which creates a new account with an initial HBAR balance by interacting with the ProtocolLayerClient. However, this method currently lacks unit and integration tests. Scenarios such as successful account creation, invalid initial balances, and exception handling (e.g., HieroException) are untested, leaving this functionality vulnerable to potential issues.

Suggested solution

Create a new test class or extend the existing test suite for AccountClientImpl to include tests for the createAccount method. Use JUnit to validate positive scenarios like successful account creation and negative scenarios such as invalid HBAR balances and error handling during account creation.

📋 Step by step guide to do a contribution

If you have never contributed to an open source project at GitHub, the following step-by-step guide will introduce you to the workflow.
A more detailed general documentation of the GitHub PR workflow can be found here.

  • Claim this issue: Comment below that you are interested in working on the issue
  • Wait for assignment: A community member with the given rights will add you as an assignee of the issue
  • Fork the repository: You can do that in GitHub (by simply clicking the 'fork' button).
  • Check out the forked repository
  • Create a feature branch for the issue. We do not have a hard naming definition for branches but it is best practice to prefix the branch name with the issue id.
  • Solve the issue in your branch.
  • Commit your changes: to your branch. Here it is important to sign-off you commits to fullfill the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). More information can be found in our contribution guideline.
  • Start a Pull Request (PR): in the hedera-enterprise repository
  • Check GitHub Actions: Several GitHub Actions will be triggered automatically for each PR. If a GitHub Action fails and you do not understand the cause of that error do not hesitate to add a comment to the PR and ask the community for support.
  • Wait for reviews: Members of the community will review your PR. If a reviewer finds any missing pieces or a problem, he or she will start a discussion with you and describe the next steps for solving the problem.
  • You did it 🎉: We will merge the fix in the develop branch. Thanks for being part of our community as an open-source contributor ❤️

🎉 Contribute to Hacktoberfest

Solve this issue as part of the Hacktoberfest event and get a chance to receive cool goodies like a T-Shirt. 🎽

🤔 Additional informantion

If you have any questions, just ask us directly in this issue by adding a comment. A general manual about open-source contributions can be found here.

@hendrikebbers hendrikebbers added the good first issue candidate Label for issues that should be labeled by 'good first issue' but missing a good documentation label Nov 16, 2024
@Ndacyayisenga-droid Ndacyayisenga-droid changed the title Module hedera-base miss tests for functionality of AccountClientImpl.createAccount Module hiero-base miss tests for functionality of AccountClientImpl.createAccount Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue candidate Label for issues that should be labeled by 'good first issue' but missing a good documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant