Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feasibility study: cross-back-end process graph handling #53

Closed
soxofaan opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Feasibility study: cross-back-end process graph handling #53

soxofaan opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@soxofaan
Copy link
Member

soxofaan commented Aug 3, 2022

from #52:

Feasibility study of cross-back-end processing: Support process graphs with collections and processes from different backends

Increasing levels of complexity to evaluate:

  • basic POC: find maximal subgraphs supported by each backend (based on collection and/or process availability)
  • split a given process graph into valid subgraphs
  • manually run a workflow that combines sub-process-graphs run on separate back-ends
  • ultimately (when deemed feasible): implement automatic execution through "partitioned job" system in aggregator: split, schedule (with dependencies), combine, ...
@jdries
Copy link
Contributor

jdries commented Mar 8, 2023

The feasibility study was performed and presented at SRR4. I'll close this issue now, as it's replaced with more specific issues such as setting up an actual POC.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

3 participants