[2020-11-22 Sun 22:35] Imagine you have weekly meetings with other people, and during the week you take notes about items to discuss at each meeting. When the time for a meeting comes, you want to quickly and easily search for all of the items to discuss at the meeting.
You’ve been experimenting with different ways to track such data in Org. You’ve tried using tags, but some of the names in question conflict with other tags in your data (e.g. someone’s named Charles, but you also work with a firm named Charles, Inc., and you’d prefer to continue using the tag Charles for entries about that firm), so you’ve been using tags like :personNAME:, which seems awkward. You’ve tried using a :person: NAME property on entries, which has the advantage of not cluttering the tags list, but also the disadvantage of not being readily visible in an outline.
So you haven’t decided on a long-term solution, but the meetings aren’t going to wait–you need to search that data now, and you have a mix of both tags and properties in your entries. What you need is to be able to search for all of the entries about Alice (which you’ve tagged :personAlice:) when you’re meeting with her, and all of the entries about Bob (which have the property :person: Bob) when you’re meeting with him. What do you do?
- Using built-in predicates
- A custom (person) predicate
- Searching for multiple people at once
- Normalizing queries to rewrite arguments
- Non-sexp query syntax
- Using multiple predicates
- Predicate aliases
- Be formless
- Conclusion
- Appendix: Anaphoric macros
You could start by using built-in Org QL predicates to search your data. For example:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(or (tags "personAlice")
(property "person" "Bob")))#+RESULTS[91a413cda23cb65d6bb99212e111f283e5a5c910]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
That was easy enough, but it’s not very…semantic. You have to think about the implementation details: Alice uses tags, Bob uses properties, and what if Charlie uses both? It starts to feel complicated, and it’s a lot to type out every time. Is there an easier way?
Enter org-ql custom search predicates. Let’s start simple, by defining a predicate to search for just the :person: property, one person at a time. The predicate will take one argument, a person’s name, and search for that property. It would look like this:
(org-ql-defpred person (name)
"Search for entries with the \"person\" property being NAME."
:body (property "person" name))Now, let’s see what results we get for searching this file for entries about Bob:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Bob"))#+RESULTS[c11a4ce2c4f179d7487c9b46eff9f72766bc2bc4]:
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
Hmm, looks like we need to remind Bob to wash his mug and take some mints after lunch. Now what do we need to discuss with Alice?
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice"))#+RESULTS[1f12f437042bbc077a4696d707805c1367f2ca3d]:
Nothing? Oh, right, Alice’s entries use the :personAlice: tag, so we’ll also need to search those kind of entries. Let’s make the predicate do that, too:
(org-ql-defpred person (name)
"Search for entries with the \"person\" property being NAME or having the tag \"personNAME\"."
:body (or (property "person" name)
(tags (concat "person" name))))How about now?
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice"))#+RESULTS[1f12f437042bbc077a4696d707805c1367f2ca3d]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
Hmm, I thought we already told her to leave Polly at home.
Oh, wait, this week is shortened due to holidays, so we’re having a combined meeting. How do we search for entries about either of them? Well, this is the obvious solution:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(or (person "Alice")
(person "Bob")))#+RESULTS[4e4c75bde4fbceaadb076a53410c1625d1283e06]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
And that works fine. But it seems like a lot to type. Could we make the person predicate accept multiple names instead?
(org-ql-defpred person (&rest names)
"Search for entries about any of NAMES."
:body (cl-loop for name in names
thereis (or (property "person" name)
(tags (concat "person" name)))))Now let’s search again:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[4f5971c56616f01d8d3c28a66ef380495ee3e158]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
That was easy!
Now, all this is well and good if you don’t have hundreds of thousands of Org entries in your files. But what if you do? All that concat‘ing happening on every entry could add up, and the query might take a few seconds. What if we could do that stringing-along just once, before running the query? We want to turn our (person "Alice" "Bob") query into this, with the :personNAME: strings already made and the per-person (property ...) predicates also included:
(or (tags "personAlice" "personBob")
(property "person" "Alice")
(property "person" "Bob"))Can we do that? In fact, we can, by using a query normalizer. Normalizers are pcase forms (I know) that normalize query expressions before execution. We can use one to rewrite the query ahead of time, like this:
(org-ql-defpred person (&rest names)
"Search for entries about any of NAMES."
:normalizers ((`(person . ,names)
`(or (tags ,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect (concat "person" name)))
,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect `(property "person" ,name)))))
:body (cl-loop for name in names
thereis (or (property "person" name)
(tags name))))Now, don’t faint from all the backquoting and unquoting–it’s just Lisp, nothing to be afraid of! Let’s slow down a moment and see what the normalized query looks like to be sure we’re doing it correctly:
(org-ql--normalize-query '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[ebc46fff31b72359353dda539a26c95b7d650df2]:
(or (tags "personAlice" "personBob")
(property "person" "Alice")
(property "person" "Bob"))And, as they say, Bob’s your uncle! Or even if he isn’t, let’s see if it works:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[4f5971c56616f01d8d3c28a66ef380495ee3e158]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
Yep, same result as the non-normalized query. And look at how much simpler it is to write (person "Alice" "Bob") than to write (or (tags "personAlice" "personBob") (property "person" "Alice") (property "person" "Bob")).
But wait, that’s not all! If you order now, we’ll throw in non-sexp query syntax for free! That’s right, your search could be as simple as typing person:Alice,Bob!
(org-ql-search (current-buffer) "person:Alice,Bob")Don’t believe me? Well, you see, queries in this syntax are converted to the sexp syntax, like:
(org-ql--query-string-to-sexp "person:Alice,Bob")#+RESULTS[a60655544956644605c23c152570185c329faa87]:
(person "Alice" "Bob")And that happens automatically when you use a search command like org-ql-search. If you have org-ql installed already, you could even click this link: Alice or Bob. Which, in Org syntax, looks like:
[[org-ql-search:person:Alice,Bob]]
And that would open an Agenda Mode buffer that looks like this:
Query: (person "Alice" "Bob") In:meetings.org [#A] Loud pet parakeet :personAlice: [#C] Missing sticky notes :personAlice: [#C] Dirty dishes in sink :personAlice: [#A] Stinky coffee breath
Oops, you forgot that there’s a birthday party in 20 minutes, so you only have time to talk about the highest priority items at this joint meeting today.
No problem, let’s just select high-priority items:
(org-ql-search (current-buffer) "person:Alice,Bob priority:A")Which shows:
Query: (and (person "Alice" "Bob") (priority "A")) In:meetings.org [#A] Loud pet parakeet :personAlice: [#A] Stinky coffee breath
And, you know what, if you’re just so busy that you don’t even have time to type the word person, you can add an abbreviated alias, p, like this:
(org-ql-defpred (person p) (&rest names)
"Search for entries about any of NAMES."
:normalizers ((`(,predicate-names . ,names)
`(or (tags ,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect (concat "person" name)))
,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect `(property "person" ,name)))))
:body (cl-loop for name in names
thereis (or (property "person" name)
(tags (concat "person" name)))))Let’s try it:
(org-ql-search (current-buffer) "p:Alice,Bob priority:A")And that shows:
Query: (and (person "Alice" "Bob") (priority "A")) In:meetings.org [#A] Loud pet parakeet :personAlice: [#A] Stinky coffee breath
(It’s up to you to remember whether p means person or priority, but code can’t solve everything.)
We can even go a step further: since the normalizer rewrites the query to call the property and tags predicates instead, this person predicate doesn’t even need a body form!
(org-ql-defpred (person p) (&rest names)
"Search for entries about any of NAMES."
:normalizers ((`(,predicate-names . ,names)
`(or (tags ,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect (concat "person" name)))
,@(cl-loop for name in names
collect `(property "person" ,name))))))Will it still work?
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[4f5971c56616f01d8d3c28a66ef380495ee3e158]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
It does!
In this tutorial, we’ve gone from having to write lengthy, complex query expressions for accommodating idiosyncratic requirements, to being able to write simple query expressions that abstract away ugly details, to rewriting those query expressions into a more optimal form before a search is even run. The end result is an Org Query Language that is customized to meet your specific needs.
What new custom predicates will you write next?
Finally, if you’re a Lisper who appreciates anaphora, you might prefer a more syntactically concise definition of the predicate using Dash macros:
(org-ql-defpred (person p) (&rest names)
"Search for entries about any of NAMES."
:normalizers ((`(,predicate-names . ,names)
`(or (tags ,@(--map (concat "person" it) names))
,@(--map `(property "person" ,it) names)))))Let’s make sure it normalizes correctly:
(org-ql--normalize-query '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[ebc46fff31b72359353dda539a26c95b7d650df2]:
(or (tags "personAlice" "personBob")
(property "person" "Alice")
(property "person" "Bob"))It does, so the query also produces the correct results:
(org-ql-query :select '(org-get-heading :no-tags)
:from (current-buffer)
:where '(person "Alice" "Bob"))#+RESULTS[4f5971c56616f01d8d3c28a66ef380495ee3e158]:
- [#A] Loud pet parakeet
- [#C] Missing sticky notes
- [#C] Dirty dishes in sink
- [#A] Stinky coffee breath
Lisp is fun!