Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][ADD] account_reconcile_no_numerical_token #753

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thomaspaulb
Copy link

By default, when Odoo encounters a bank statement line ref such as a34bc3xxx1, it will extract the numerical characters and concatenate them into a numerical token, eg. 3431 in this case. If then a move line is found that has for example cxxx343y1 as a ref, it will match with this one also: not on the text ref but via the numerical component.

Sometimes this is not desirable.

This module allows to configure a checkbox on a reconcile model to disable numerical token matching for this model.

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

If this has to be with the modules, then it should be account_reconcile_model_no_numerical_token.

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Nov 22, 2024
By default, when Odoo encounters a bank statement line ref such as a34bc3xxx1, it
will extract the numerical characters and concatenate them into a numerical token,
eg. 3431 in this case. If then a move line is found that has for example cxxx343y1
as a ref, it will match with this one also: not on the text ref but via the
numerical component.

Sometimes this is not desirable.

This module allows to configure a checkbox on a reconcile model to disable
numerical token matching for this model.
@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb force-pushed the 16.0-add-account_reconcile_no_numerical_token branch from 569aea1 to 8a22d84 Compare November 28, 2024 15:20
@thomaspaulb
Copy link
Author

I agree that it's not that widely useful since the whole model moves to EE in 17, but at least for some of our 16 instances that use the regular Odoo reconcilation this is useful, and I can imagine it could also be backported to earlier versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants