You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, the generate repeats function will ignore a task marked as repeating if that task is under a DONE heading. I would liketo have an option to have those tasks included in the generate repeats process. I understand there may be times or workflows where this is not desired which is why I think an option to allow this, defaulting to false, would be a nice compromise.
I like to keep my daily notes clean and actionable, so several times a day I will move all done tasks to the DONE heading. At the end of the day, I then run the generate repeats function. Since I've cleaned my note, though, the repeat task will not get recreated.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jgclark
changed the title
Allow repeat generation when task is in DONE section of Note
Repeat Extensions: Allow repeat generation when task is in DONE section of Note
Oct 9, 2024
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No
Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, the generate repeats function will ignore a task marked as repeating if that task is under a DONE heading. I would liketo have an option to have those tasks included in the generate repeats process. I understand there may be times or workflows where this is not desired which is why I think an option to allow this, defaulting to false, would be a nice compromise.
I like to keep my daily notes clean and actionable, so several times a day I will move all done tasks to the DONE heading. At the end of the day, I then run the generate repeats function. Since I've cleaned my note, though, the repeat task will not get recreated.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: