-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nRF9160 Mcumgr FMFU update support #73
Comments
Do you have a Bluetooth LE connectivity in the nRF91 device? As far as I know, DFU for 91 devices is done using cellular. |
Yes, we have Bluetooth LE connectivity by using external Bluetooth controller (nRF52833). |
The DFU using cellular is very data intensive task. Our devices have very limited budget. We already have integrated this library into our mobile application for regular DFU. We would like to extend the update process with a FMFU step. |
The verification that the FMFU is working correctly using: from pynrfjprog import HighLevel
with HighLevel.API() as api:
with HighLevel.ModemUARTDFUProbe(api, uart, baudrate) as modem_dfu_probe:
modem_dfu_probe.program(modem_firmware_zip)
modem_dfu_probe.verify(modem_firmware_zip) If i understand correctly that the endpoints should be available using the mcumgr transport layer using BT. The Logic of parsing and sending mfw data to the endpoints is closed inside the DLL nrfjprog. |
Thank you for the answer. I'll talk with my colleagues and come back to you. I have no knowledge about FMFU yet. |
Btw, RFC for tunelling SMP commands via other device: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#44224 |
We are using the nrf91 as Bluetooth Host. So the bluetooth connection is directly interfacing with the nrf91 chip. The question is probably targeted on how we are updating the nrf52 controller. The answer is second GATT service with different UUID, which forwards the requests to the nrf52 mcumgr over our multiplexed UART transport layer(HCI interface, Mcumgr interface). The tunneling feature would allow us to ditch the secondary UUID. This would make our solution a little neater. Our solution is by no means perfect. |
@philips77 Did you manage to get information about the FMFU Mcumgr implementation ? We would like to be able upgrade our devices to modem firmware 1.3.2. First thing when we are raising tickets on devzone is response that we should retest with the newest available modem firmware, which we are unable to do. |
Hi, I am in the same situation i want to upgrade the modem firmware FMFU(nrf91) of remote devices. |
Hello,
i would like to ask you, whether you are planing to implement the FMFU part of the Nordic Connect SDK into the nRF connect device manager application.
FMFU
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: