diff --git a/packages/core/src/internal/reconciliation/helpers/reconcile-from.ts b/packages/core/src/internal/reconciliation/helpers/reconcile-from.ts
index 287be1562..f9fe4e33a 100644
--- a/packages/core/src/internal/reconciliation/helpers/reconcile-from.ts
+++ b/packages/core/src/internal/reconciliation/helpers/reconcile-from.ts
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 import {
+  ContractCallFuture,
   ContractDeploymentFuture,
   LibraryDeploymentFuture,
-  ContractCallFuture,
   NamedArtifactContractDeploymentFuture,
   NamedArtifactLibraryDeploymentFuture,
-  StaticCallFuture,
   SendDataFuture,
+  StaticCallFuture,
 } from "../../../types/module";
 import { resolveFutureFrom } from "../../execution/future-processor/helpers/future-resolvers";
 import {
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ export function reconcileFrom(
     | StaticCallExecutionState,
   context: ReconciliationContext
 ): ReconciliationFutureResultFailure | undefined {
+  if (future.from === undefined && context.accounts.includes(exState.from)) {
+    return undefined;
+  }
+
   const resolvedFrom = resolveFutureFrom(
     future.from,
     context.accounts,
diff --git a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractCall.ts b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractCall.ts
index 37aa17c44..88cc138e8 100644
--- a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractCall.ts
+++ b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractCall.ts
@@ -94,6 +94,40 @@ describe("Reconciliation - named contract call", () => {
     );
   });
 
+  it("should reconcile when the from is undefined but the exState's from is in the accounts list", async () => {
+    const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
+      const contract1 = m.contract("Contract1");
+
+      m.call(contract1, "function1", [1, "a", contract1], { from: undefined });
+
+      return { contract1 };
+    });
+
+    await assertSuccessReconciliation(
+      moduleDefinition,
+      createDeploymentState(
+        {
+          ...exampleDeploymentState,
+          id: "Module#Contract1",
+          status: ExecutionStatus.SUCCESS,
+          result: {
+            type: ExecutionResultType.SUCCESS,
+            address: differentAddress,
+          },
+        },
+        {
+          ...exampleContractCallState,
+          id: "Module#Contract1.function1",
+          futureType: FutureType.CONTRACT_CALL,
+          status: ExecutionStatus.SUCCESS,
+          functionName: "function1",
+          args: [1, "a", differentAddress],
+          from: exampleAccounts[2],
+        }
+      )
+    );
+  });
+
   it("should find changes to contract unreconciliable", async () => {
     const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
       const contract1 = m.contract("Contract1");
diff --git a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractDeployment.ts b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractDeployment.ts
index 7271abf4e..3ba19a6b0 100644
--- a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractDeployment.ts
+++ b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedContractDeployment.ts
@@ -96,6 +96,34 @@ describe("Reconciliation - named contract", () => {
     );
   });
 
+  /**
+   * This test here is in a first run, the from is undefined and the defaultSender is used.
+   * On the second run the from is undefined but a different defaultSender is now in play.
+   * We say this should reconcile but the account from the first run should be used, as long
+   * as it is in the accounts list
+   */
+  it("should reconcile where the future is undefined but the exState's from is in the accounts list", async () => {
+    const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
+      const contract1 = m.contract("Contract", [], {
+        id: "Example",
+        from: undefined,
+      });
+
+      return { contract1 };
+    });
+
+    await assertSuccessReconciliation(
+      moduleDefinition,
+      createDeploymentState({
+        ...exampleDeploymentState,
+        id: "Module#Example",
+        status: ExecutionStatus.STARTED,
+        contractName: "Contract",
+        from: exampleAccounts[3],
+      })
+    );
+  });
+
   it("should find changes to contract name unreconciliable", async () => {
     const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
       const contract1 = m.contract("ContractChanged", [], {
diff --git a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedStaticCall.ts b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedStaticCall.ts
index 691ec4c33..e8892a548 100644
--- a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedStaticCall.ts
+++ b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileNamedStaticCall.ts
@@ -95,6 +95,43 @@ describe("Reconciliation - named static call", () => {
     );
   });
 
+  it("should reconcile when the from is undefined but the exState's from is in the accounts list", async () => {
+    const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
+      const contract1 = m.contract("Contract1");
+
+      m.staticCall(contract1, "function1", [1, "a"], 0, {
+        from: undefined,
+      });
+
+      return { contract1 };
+    });
+
+    await assertSuccessReconciliation(
+      moduleDefinition,
+      createDeploymentState(
+        {
+          ...exampleDeploymentState,
+          id: "Module#Contract1",
+          status: ExecutionStatus.SUCCESS,
+          result: {
+            type: ExecutionResultType.SUCCESS,
+            address: exampleAddress,
+          },
+        },
+        {
+          ...exampleStaticCallState,
+          id: "Module#Contract1.function1",
+          futureType: FutureType.STATIC_CALL,
+          status: ExecutionStatus.SUCCESS,
+          contractAddress: exampleAddress,
+          functionName: "function1",
+          args: [1, "a"],
+          from: exampleAccounts[4],
+        }
+      )
+    );
+  });
+
   it("should find changes to contract unreconciliable", async () => {
     const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
       const contract1 = m.contract("Contract1");
diff --git a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileSendData.ts b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileSendData.ts
index 06dca8e5c..6303f3658 100644
--- a/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileSendData.ts
+++ b/packages/core/test/reconciliation/futures/reconcileSendData.ts
@@ -56,6 +56,31 @@ describe("Reconciliation - send data", () => {
     );
   });
 
+  /**
+   * This test here is in a first run, the from is undefined and the defaultSender is used.
+   * On the second run the from is undefined but a different defaultSender is now in play.
+   * We say this should reconcile but the account from the first run should be used, as long
+   * as it is in the accounts list.
+   */
+  it("should reconcile where the future is undefined but the exState's from is in the accounts list", async () => {
+    const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
+      m.send("test_send", exampleAddress, 0n, "example_data", {
+        from: undefined,
+      });
+
+      return {};
+    });
+
+    await assertSuccessReconciliation(
+      moduleDefinition,
+      createDeploymentState({
+        ...exampleSendState,
+        id: "Module#test_send",
+        status: ExecutionStatus.STARTED,
+      })
+    );
+  });
+
   it("should reconcile between undefined and 0x for data", async () => {
     const moduleDefinition = buildModule("Module", (m) => {
       m.send("test_send", exampleAddress, 0n, undefined);