-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 757
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VMAF score of 100 for pictures with artefacts #1165
Comments
Can you share .yuvs/.y4ms and the command-line you used? I would like to try to reproduce. |
Find attached the first example.pedestrian_3.zip
see below the result : vmaf_pedestrian.txt |
Thanks for sharing your finding and the corresponding files. We will take a look on our end as a corner case of the metric. In this case, the distortions are quite localized distortions (especially the first one) so I doubt a spatial (i.e. frame-based) feature averaging can catch this well. |
Hi, closing this as part of a clean-up. Please feel free to re-open this issue or a new one if you have further questions. |
Hi, |
Actually I'll leave this open to provide updates in the future, we are working on a version that will fix this edge case and similar ones but it's not ready to be open-sourced yet. |
Hi all,
When I'm trying to run vmaf executable on a test sequence I obtain a vmaf score of 100 which is not possible comparing the two following frames:
As you can see we have artifacts on the second frame. This cannot lead to a VMAF score of 100.
I'm trying another sequence with the same strange results on black artefacts where I have a score of VMAF = 94.608120:
Have you already see this kind of score using VMAF measure on sequence with corrupted pixels?
If needed I can send YUV files.
The version of the VMAF I use is 2.3.1 and the model is vmaf_v0.6.1.
BR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: