Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC: Get rid off third-party storage requirements #263

Open
AndrewDryga opened this issue Sep 3, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

RFC: Get rid off third-party storage requirements #263

AndrewDryga opened this issue Sep 3, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@AndrewDryga
Copy link
Member

Right now we have a PostgreSQL infrastructure requirement, but it looks like an overkill for a simple configuration storage. Instead, we could leverage something far simpler and built into Erlang (eg. Mnesia or DETS.)

Arrising question: how to sync data between instances?..
@LucasBadico
Copy link

Well, for me have a database is a needed evil, but I'm really think on make use of dynamodb, so a option, instead of get rid off is to give the option to choose the database, adapter and stuffs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AndrewDryga @LucasBadico