Update data publishing articles according to feedback

[nap84]

• Data Publishing Standards: Add workflow images for each article (for authors, for publishers, for infrastructure providers) #405
• fix typo in the "isSupplmenetTo" under the "Usage of the relation type..." section (authors)
• emphasis on data linking: without IsSupplement to → NO LINKING (publishers)
  • or rather that only DAS means data is not actually linked. Technically, it does not need to be IsSupplementedBy
    Added:

Without defining a relation in the Crossref metadata, only humans can effectively interpret this connection through the data availability statement, effectively resulting in a missing link between the the reported results in the article and the underlying research data.

• double check Crossref spelling
• put the sentence "In agreement with Crossref's documentation..." before the XML example.
• Fix grammar issues in "Encourage authors to publish datasets under review prior the articles gets published"
• better define third party "The submission system should then require the submitter to provide the necessary information, such as the DOI (specified as DOI name e.g. 10.1000/182 or as a URL i.e. including a resolver e.g. https://doi.org/10.1000/182 ), repository name, third party name and contact information, or reasons for restricted access and information on how to access a dataset, depending on the template used. (publishers)
• The sentence "While researchers upload their data, metadata is attached." is quite generic (infrstructure providers)
• Data Publishing Standards: More information and implementation support (infrastructure providers) #407
• Data Publishing Standards: Image showing linking research data in crossref metadata (publishers) #406

[nap84]

On Crossref spelling: R is no longer capitalized, just the C

✅ double-checked all instances

[nap84]

Small fixes done, anything else converted into new issues.