Stratospheric assessment of BMT1850 (104) ahead of coupled chemistry simulation #11
Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
I ran the MT 104 model run with and without the jet tuning suggested by Julio and here are the diagnostics (thanks to Justin) These also include some seasonal cycle plots, under the WACCM category |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Winds in DJF are a little weaker in the jet_tuing run in the NH: and temperatures are warmer in Nov/Dec but better in spring: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Simone which run is the one labeled 'cool nickname'? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's a look at some features of the stratosphere to inform on whether we are ready to start a BMT1850 with coupled chemistry.
Zonal mean zonal wind. Looking pretty good. Maybe a bit too strong in the NH winter.
SH vortex seasonality. We no longer have the really big problems with the too late breakdown that we had in earlier development runs. Now in the winter and spring it's looking pretty similar to the CMIP6 WACCM piControl. Looks a bit better than that in the summer and autumn.
NH vortex seasonality. Too strong in the late winter and spring. Maybe we need to try tuning this.
Water vapor tape recorder.
Don't panic. It's hard to compare 1850 with present day in terms of magnitudes as there are big changes between the periods as shown by the figure from LENS2 below. There were concerns before that the driest time was happening too late (April/May). In the above plot it looks like now the driest month is in January i.e., a bit closer to the driest month of February in the observations.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions