-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes for CLM lake to work in CCPP SCM #497
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
02f10bb
Changes for CLM lake to work in CCPP SCM
dustinswales 8186805
Omission from previous commit
dustinswales 9389555
Updated physics
dustinswales bb03b34
update physics hash
dustinswales 1999a7a
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-scm into hotfix/c…
dustinswales 9de6095
Doh
dustinswales 5d2c49e
move landfrac/lakefrac/lakedepth out of IF statement to preserve work…
grantfirl aa99c2d
Revert submodule.
dustinswales File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dustinswales I don't understand why this is needed. If one is using only ICs for LSMs (i.e. the GABLS3 canned cases), you don't need all of the orographic data. Are you saying that we need
landfrac
,lakefrac
andlakedepth
as additional variables when importing LSM ICs?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, if the LSM is coupled to a lake model, we need landfrac, lakefrac and lakedepth as ICs.
I didn't want to add a new flag for "lake_ics", so I did this. I'm open to alternatives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's weird that these variables are included in the "oro" files rather than the "sfc" files. I'm going to push a commit to this that needs to be tested for both a canned GABLS3 case and a UFS lake case to make sure that it's doing the right thing. As-is, this will break the GABLS3 canned cases, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm going to test it real quick before I try to "fix" anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dustinswales Please see dustinswales#13.