Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring LRM Plugin Template Creation in Line with COSMOS #1045

Open
CarsonDavis opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1072
Open

Bring LRM Plugin Template Creation in Line with COSMOS #1045

CarsonDavis opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #1072
Assignees

Comments

@CarsonDavis
Copy link
Collaborator

CarsonDavis commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

COSMOS already creates templates. We need the LRM process to be aligned with the automation that exists in COSMOS, either by switching to use the automation, or by updating it to include the LRM processes.

We currently have templates being created through workflow status updates for the collections on COSMOS but are only using them to track the collections indexed, not directly using those templates to create the configs we're using and eventually merging to staging after merging webapp_config_generation.

Implementation Considerations

  • Analysis of the current workflow process and requirements.
  • Updates (if any) to the COSMOS automation.
  • need to meet with Carson about how to ensure control over templates

Deliverable

Incorporating the COSMOS template creation fully into the curation workflow process.

Dependencies

depends on

@dhanur-sharma
Copy link

LRM needs the ability to modify the template that is created by COSMOS and pushed to webapp_config_generation.

@CarsonDavis CarsonDavis self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@CarsonDavis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This needs to be merged in with the rest of the COSMOS updates.

@dhanur-sharma
Copy link

Resolved merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants