Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating a mech using Prototype DHS rules does not calculate Heat Dissipation correctly unless all heatsinks are Prototype #1616

Open
7 tasks done
EgoReaper opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Mek Concerns Meks Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form

Comments

@EgoReaper
Copy link

Prerequisites and Pre-Issue Checklist

  • I'm reporting the issue to the correct repository:

  • MegaMek

  • MegaMekLab

  • MekHQ

  • I've tested the issue against at least the latest MILESTONE version

  • I've asked on the MegaMek Discord about the error

  • I've reviewed the BattleTech rules and MegaMekLab documentation, and I've confirmed that something isn't working as intended.

  • I've searched the Github tracker and haven't found the issue listed

Severity *

Low (Minor/Nuisance): Minor glitches or cosmetic issues that don’t affect gameplay and occur rarely.

Brief Description *

When creating a mech using the experimental Double(Freezer) heatsink type, unless all heatsinks outside of the engine are prototype heatsinks, the heat dissipation at the lower right does not calculate correctly.

Steps to Reproduce

Create a mech

set year to 3039

set rules level to experimental

set heatsink type to double(Freezer)

set number of double heatsinks such that they are not all heatsinks outside of the engine

print sheet to pdf

open sheet and see that heat dissipation at lower right is not correctly listed for the amount of DHS added to mech.

Operating System *

Windows 10

Java Version *

17.0.6

MegaMek Suite Version *

v0.49.19.1

Custom MegaMekLab Version

No response

Attach Files

logs.zip

Final Checklist

  • I've checked to make sure that this issue has not already been filed
  • I'm reporting only one issue in this ticket for clarity and focus
@SJuliez SJuliez added the Mek Concerns Meks label Sep 16, 2024
@HammerGS HammerGS added the Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form label Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Mek Concerns Meks Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants