Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TRO View problem #6150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

TRO View problem #6150

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

SJuliez
Copy link
Member

@SJuliez SJuliez commented Oct 28, 2024

This reverts a recent change that broke the troview
image

@SJuliez SJuliez requested a review from IllianiCBT October 28, 2024 10:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.07%. Comparing base (a654d22) to head (c69bfa8).
Report is 63 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6150      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     29.20%   29.07%   -0.13%     
- Complexity    13971    13972       +1     
============================================
  Files          2623     2601      -22     
  Lines        266292   267448    +1156     
  Branches      47553    47747     +194     
============================================
+ Hits          77767    77769       +2     
- Misses       184629   185776    +1147     
- Partials       3896     3903       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

I have no idea why I used wordWrap here as it was completely unnecessary

@HammerGS HammerGS merged commit 798f4f2 into MegaMek:master Oct 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@SJuliez SJuliez deleted the troview branch October 30, 2024 07:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants