Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mechanized Tracked Platoon (Flamer) pays you for monthly spare parts and fuel instead of charging you #6264

Closed
7 tasks done
OrbMonky opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #6263
Closed
7 tasks done
Labels
Bug Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form

Comments

@OrbMonky
Copy link

Prerequisites and Pre-Issue Checklist

  • I'm reporting the issue to the correct repository:

  • MegaMek

  • MegaMekLab

  • MekHQ

  • I've tested the issue against at least the latest MILESTONE version

  • I've asked on the MegaMek Discord about the error

  • I've reviewed the BattleTech rules and MegaMekLab documentation, and I've confirmed that something isn't working as intended.

  • I've searched the Github tracker and haven't found the issue listed

Severity *

Low (Minor/Nuisance): Minor glitches or cosmetic issues that don’t affect gameplay and occur rarely.

Brief Description *

image
image

May be other instances of something like this but this is the only one I came across due to the new employer-provided mothballing behavior. The unit is unmanned/not in TOE so it was the only one to generated a cbill/fuel/ammo report this month!

logs.zip

Campaign file and MekHQ log included, no customs in this campaign

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Have unit specified
  2. Check monthly costs report or have it unmothballed with no other active units on monthly cost generation

Operating System *

Windows 10

Java Version *

17

MegaMek Suite Version *

None

Custom MegaMekLab Version

Implemented Resupply Module #4518

Attach Files

No response

Final Checklist

  • I've checked to make sure that this issue has not already been filed
  • I'm reporting only one issue in this ticket for clarity and focus
@HammerGS HammerGS transferred this issue from MegaMek/megameklab Dec 10, 2024
@repligator repligator added the Bug label Dec 10, 2024
@psikomonkie
Copy link
Collaborator

This is caused by an incorrect calculation for infantry weights, resulting in a negative weight, and negative costs. This is an issue in MegaMek - #6263

Can this be moved to MegaMek/megamek? Thanks

@IllianiCBT IllianiCBT transferred this issue from MegaMek/mekhq Dec 14, 2024
@SJuliez SJuliez added the Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form label Dec 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Severity: Low Issues described as low severity as per the new issue form
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants