Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bottleneck simulations even with caching #212

Open
climbcat opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

bottleneck simulations even with caching #212

climbcat opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
v.2.0 Postponed until we have funding for big overhaul

Comments

@climbcat
Copy link
Contributor

Investigate bottleneck 14th of sep. 2018 on e-neutrons and come up with some solutions. Also, can caching searches take priority over simulations?
@willend
Copy link
Contributor

willend commented Sep 14, 2018

Huh? I heard of no bottleneck - what is happening?

@climbcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Viktor reported that no simulations went through, I had to restart uwsgi, but we may need a long-term solution?

@climbcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Approximate scan usage during the session:

N | runs | cached | forced
21 | 44 | 64 | 5
30 | 3 | 0 | 0
50 | 3 | 2 | 0
100 | 0 | 2 | 0

@climbcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is probably not an very frequent issue, should we close this?

@willend
Copy link
Contributor

willend commented Jun 27, 2019

Looks like a timing/bottleneck issue. Postpone to 2.0

@willend willend added the v.2.0 Postponed until we have funding for big overhaul label Jun 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
v.2.0 Postponed until we have funding for big overhaul
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@willend @climbcat