Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming for easier viewing in the scanner #55

Open
littlebear22 opened this issue Sep 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Naming for easier viewing in the scanner #55

littlebear22 opened this issue Sep 25, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@littlebear22
Copy link

Playing with Enigmatica 6 pack v0.5.2

In the past using RFTools (playing modded packs in Minecraft 1.12) I was able to name Tier 1/2/3 Storage Modules, and put them inside of Modular Storage blocks. Then using the Storage Scanner I was able to see the names I chose for each storage module. For example, I might name a module "Ores", tuck it inside of a modular storage, then in the list of scannable inventories in the Storage Scanner, it would be listed as "Ores" just like I named it.

On the version I'm playing (v2.0.12 of RFTools Storage) for Minecraft 1.16.5, this functionality does not seem to exist. I repeated the steps above exactly: I used an anvil to name a Tier 1 Storage Module, then placed it inside the Modular Storage block. I locked the block and used the Storage Scanner. But it lists the Modular Storage as just that, "Modular Storage". I even tried to name the Modular Storage block in the anvil, but of course it lost it's name as soon as it was re-placed in the world.

Thank you McJty for making all your awesome mods. I don't know if this is a bug, a feature that was removed, or if I am just not following the correct steps for the latest version. But I'd dearly like to be able to name my different storage blocks in the scanner. My hyper-organizing mind is going nuts with everything called the same thing! Please let me know if I need to clarify or add any information. Thank you for your time.

@DatenThielt
Copy link

#64

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants