Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NewFeature Analytical Short-term g-function #149

Open
j-c-cook opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

NewFeature Analytical Short-term g-function #149

j-c-cook opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@j-c-cook
Copy link
Contributor

j-c-cook commented Aug 30, 2021

Javed and Claesson (2011) present an analytical solution for the short-term temperature response. It is validated against a numerical implementation and sandbox data. Detailed mathematical solution is given in Claesson (2011).


Javed, S., & Claesson, J. (2011). New analytical and numerical solutions for the short-term analysis of vertical ground heat exchangers. ASHRAE Transactions, 117(1), 3–12.

Claesson, J. (2011). Radial heat flow for a pipe in a borehole in ground using Laplace solutions. Report on mathematical background.

@MassimoCimmino
Copy link
Owner

I am considering the implementation of our transient multipole solution presented in [1].

This solution has the added feature of considering the position of the pipes in the borehole and the short-circuit resistance. It would allow us to re-use some of the interface of the steady-state pipe models in the pipes module.


[1] Prieto, C., & Cimmino, M. (2020). Transient multipole expansion for heat transfer in ground heat exchangers. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 27(3), 253-270.

@j-c-cook
Copy link
Contributor Author

j-c-cook commented Feb 4, 2022

That sounds great. I currently don't have time to dwell into either of Claesson's papers on the subject. From a top level, I like the look of Prieto and Cimmino (2020). I'll keep an eye out for a PR implementing the solution presented in [1] and see if I can provide support in any way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants