Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
For 2 bad markers use ICP not rot3dfit
When there are two adjacent bad markers removed, rot3dfit does not work well (see #7). Therefore an alternative point to point ICP method has been implemented to give an alternative transformation matrix. This seems to give an identical solution compared with rot3dfit (with 5 markers) and much better solution for 3 markers. Workaround for #7. Thoughts @paulsowman?
- Loading branch information
cbbb4d2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cbbb4d2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could.. but rot3dfit is robust for most situations.. point to point ICP requires more testing IMO. I'll open a new issue for this.
cbbb4d2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cbbb4d2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes - only 1 iteration required versus 50 for ICP