From e8cfb10c4434ad2ad5216a50c7747a32ea7e5012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maarten Coonen Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 17:22:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed another typo --- _posts/2024-08-15-optimize-iiif-performance.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_posts/2024-08-15-optimize-iiif-performance.md b/_posts/2024-08-15-optimize-iiif-performance.md index ddc4f7a..92704aa 100644 --- a/_posts/2024-08-15-optimize-iiif-performance.md +++ b/_posts/2024-08-15-optimize-iiif-performance.md @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ cores. Subsequently, we've repeated the same tests with 8 and 16 cores. The results are shown in the figure below. On average, 8 CPU cores load a page 31.3% (8 cores) and 36.5% faster (16 cores) compared to 4 cores when tested with these file types. We expect that adding more cores will increase performance even further, although the gain per added core will be less. -![effect of cpu cores]("assets/img/posts/testing-cpu-cores.png") +![effect of cpu cores](assets/img/posts/testing-cpu-cores.png) ## TODO: Save disk space and increase page load performance by using JPG compressed source images