[Request] Reawaken features don't work with PVP Style alternative playstyle

[luke0717]

Describe the bug
When using the PVP Style feature (for single target, aoe or for winder combo), the reawaken feature only displays the first generation/legacy combo, and gets stuck at that. It never goes over to 2nd, 3rd, etc.

To Reproduce
Please try to submit as much information as possible to reproduce the behavior:

1. Version 2.0.0.12

2. VPR

3. I have the following features enabled:
   PVP Single, PVP AOE, PVP Winder, PVP Pit combo
   Generation Legacy feature
   All-in-one reawaken feature
   Merge twinfang/blood onto serpent tail (non relevant i imagine)

4. Which skill is placed in your hotbar:
   Steel Fangs

5. No other forks.

Expected behavior
I might be misunderstanding what's supposed to happen. But basically what I expected was for the skill to skill to go over every generation/legacy, to finish the combo. I only suspected it was a bug because it just gets stuck in the first generation. I have the reawaken skill in my hotbar and it works as intended with that skill. It's just with the pvp feature skill.

Screenshots or videos

Skill above is Reawaken skill, which progressed to Second Generation.. The one below is Steel Fangs (with pvp style feature enabled), stuck at First (doesn't switch back to main combo until Reawaken is spent).

[IndigoAura]

As far as i know, this is normal behaviour. the all-in-one feature replaces the reawaken button with all parts of the combo, not steel fangs. steel fangs becoming first generation is vanilla/unmodded behaviour.

[kaedys]

I believe you're correct, @IndigoAura, but I believe @luke0717's ask probably makes sense. The basic concept of the PvP-Style main combo feature is that you don't need both Steel Fangs and Dread Fangs on your bar, it compresses all of it into Steel Fangs. That same logic would suggest that the Steel Fangs should act exactly like the Reawaken button does when it's feature is turned on, the entire Reawaken combo compressed on it. May be worth enabling that functionality via some subfeatures, but I think the ask makes sense.

[luke0717]

Ah I see! I genuinely thought it was a bug, my bad. In this case, I think @kaedys said it all. We can treat this thread as a request then instead of a bug report, maybe? If that's okay.

[MKhayle]

that's okay! I'm currently sick and not able to work much on this project lately, but I'll look into this