Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsider the organization of style.css #38

Open
BraadMartin opened this issue Aug 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Reconsider the organization of style.css #38

BraadMartin opened this issue Aug 10, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@BraadMartin
Copy link
Contributor

For example:

/* 1.2 - Box Sizing
--------------------------------------------- */
@BraadMartin BraadMartin added this to the Future Release milestone Aug 10, 2015
@MickeyKay
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I hear ya'. This is one I've wondered about maintaining. The issue is that if you add a new section in development (e.g. Custom Plugin Styles), you may need to renumber all the sections.

@BraadMartin
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see the point about adding new sections, but I think it's less important that we keep custom sections perfect than it is to just have the core sections be numbered, and if we find ourselves always adding the same custom section here or there, maybe that section belongs in core Trestle.

That said, it looks like underscores has switched away from numbering sections, so maybe we shouldn't make the change. I want to take a step back and reconsider the organization of the stylesheet as a whole at some point, ideally with your perspective included, so I'll rename this issue to be more about that and we can track ideas here until we make a final decision.

@BraadMartin BraadMartin changed the title Add section numbers to the sections in style.css for quick jumping to a section Reconsider the organization of style.css Aug 11, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants