Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rearrange Graph Monitor Items #49

Open
Wooty-B opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Rearrange Graph Monitor Items #49

Wooty-B opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Wooty-B
Copy link

Wooty-B commented Dec 10, 2021

Hello, love the program! I am using tuxclocker to help tune a fanless Radeon WX GPU in a fanless embedded ARM64 system. Using the Graph Monitor, running a demanding game or 3D application lets me glance over to another monitor to see if the system is overheating. In Graph Monitor, Temperature and Power Draw are far apart from each other making it hard to see both values. My current solution is to span the window across 2 displays in leu of rotating one vertically for the same effect.

Is there any way to either scale the graphs or rearrange them at build time? This would allow me to use a smaller view, or rotate my favorite graphs to the top without scrolling. I would love to see on-the-fly graph view features in a future release if it's on your radar. Thanks!

@Lurkki14
Copy link
Owner

Hi, glad you found this useful!

The fastest way to achieve this would be to edit this bit of code that adds the widgets to the tab: https://github.com/Lurkki14/tuxclocker/blob/master/mainwindow.cpp#L225

I have planned to add removing/adding and rearranging of sensor display graphs for the new version in development (haven't worked much on it recently unfortunately) though it doesn't have much functionality for AMD GPUs yet, but adding it to the development version (cpplib branch) would be the most proper way to achieve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants