You can get started using assay
by importing the crate into your Cargo.toml
's dev
dependencies:
[dev-dependencies]
assay = "0.1.0"
Then importing the macro for your tests:
#[cfg(test)]
use assay::assay;
This setup will by default turn on the ability for async
tests using tokio
, if you wish to turn
it off to cut down on dependencies then you can do the following:
[dev-dependencies]
assay = {version = "0.1.0", no-default-features = true }
assay
also supports using the async-std
runtime if you prefer instead of
tokio
which can be enabled as such:
[dev-dependencies]
assay = {version = "0.1.0", no-default-features = true, features =
"async-std-runtime" }
Just putting on the #[assay]
attribute is the easiest way to get started:
use assay::assay;
#[assay]
fn basic_usage() {
fs::write("test", "This is a test")?;
assert_eq!(
"This is a test",
&fs::read_to_string("test")?
);
}
This does a few things:
- Your test is run in a new process so that it does not have env vars or global
state changed between tests. This works with both
cargo nextest
andcargo test
where we fork a new process with the defaultcargo test
or if you usecargo nextest
then it's already run in parallel as it's own process! - Is mounted in a temp directory automatically. The above example writes into that directory and it's all removed on test completion.
- Allows you to use the
?
operator inside of tests by using the catch allResult<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>>
return value and it handles adding theOk(())
value so you don't need to worry about that either.
This alone is great start but there's more!
You can set environment variables for each test individually. Useful if say you want to test output at different log levels. The other nice thing is that since these run as separate process you won't have race conditions in your test from when they are set and when you read them!
use assay::assay;
#[assay(
env = [
("RUST_LOG", "debug"),
("OTHER", "value")
]
)]
fn debug_level() {
assert_eq!(env::var("RUST_LOG")?, "debug");
assert_eq!(env::var("OTHER")?, "value");
}
#[assay(
env = [
("RUST_LOG", "warn"),
("OTHER", "value")
]
)]
fn warn_level() {
assert_eq!(env::var("RUST_LOG")?, "warn");
assert_eq!(env::var("OTHER")?, "value");
}
Sometimes you want to include files in your tests and generating them is one
way, but having it in your version control system and then having them be in
your tests can also be nice! With the include
directive you can include files
in your test's directory when you start running it:
use assay::assay;
#[assay(include = ["Cargo.toml", "src/lib.rs"])]
fn include() {
assert!(fs::metadata("src/lib.rs")?.is_file());
assert!(fs::metadata("Cargo.toml")?.is_file());
}
assay
will also let you mark a test that you expect to panic much like you
would for a normal Rust test:
use assay::assay;
#[assay(should_panic)]
fn panic_test() {
panic!("Panic! At The Proc-Macro");
}
If you want your tests to run async
code all you need to do is specify that the
test is async
. assay
defaults to using tokio
as the executor, but can use async-std
.
Note: you cannot use the async
functionality if no-default-features
is enabled in your
Cargo.toml
with no specified runtime.
use assay::assay;
use std::{
pin::Pin,
future::Future,
task::{Poll, Context},
};
#[assay]
async fn async_func() {
ReadyOnPoll.await;
}
struct ReadyOnPoll;
impl Future for ReadyOnPoll {
type Output = ();
fn poll(self: Pin<&mut Self>, _: &mut Context) -> Poll<Self::Output> {
Poll::Ready(())
}
}
Sometimes you need to setup the same things all the time and maybe with
different inputs. You might also need to handle tearing down things in the same
way. You can define a function call expression like so with ?
support and
different parameters as input. Just define setup
or teardown
in your macro
with the function you want used before or after the test. Note
before_each
/after_each
support for assay
does not exist yet as we'd need
some kind of macro for the file itself to modify the args to assay
.
use assay::assay;
use std::{
env,
fs,
path::PathBuf,
};
#[assay(
setup = setup_func(5)?,
teardown = teardown_func(),
)]
fn setup_teardown_test() {
assert_eq!(fs::read_to_string("setup")?, "Value: 5");
}
fn setup_func(input: i32) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
fs::write("setup", format!("Value: {}", input))?;
Ok(())
}
fn teardown_func() {
fs::remove_file("setup").unwrap();
assert!(!PathBuf::from("setup").exists());
}
These features can be combined as they use a comma separated list and so you could do something like this:
use assay::assay;
use std::{
env,
fs,
future::Future,
path::PathBuf,
pin::Pin,
task::{Poll, Context},
};
#[assay(
setup = setup_func(5)?,
env = [
("GOODBOY", "Bukka"),
("BADDOGS", "false")
],
teardown = teardown_func(),
include = ["Cargo.toml", "src/lib.rs"],
should_panic,
)]
async fn one_test_to_call_it_all() {
ReadyOnPoll.await;
assert_eq!(env::var("GOODBOY")?, "Bukka");
assert_eq!(env::var("BADDOGS")?, "false");
assert_eq!(fs::read_to_string("setup")?, "Value: 5");
assert!(PathBuf::from("Cargo.toml").exists());
assert!(PathBuf::from("src/lib.rs").exists());
// Removing this actually causes the test to fail
panic!();
}
struct ReadyOnPoll;
impl Future for ReadyOnPoll {
type Output = ();
fn poll(self: Pin<&mut Self>, _: &mut Context) -> Poll<Self::Output> {
Poll::Ready(())
}
}
fn setup_func(input: i32) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
fs::write("setup", format!("Value: {}", input))?;
Ok(())
}
fn teardown_func() {
fs::remove_file("setup").unwrap();
assert!(!PathBuf::from("setup").exists());
}
Use as many or as few features as you need!
While assay
is capable of a lot right now it's not without issues:
- Tests run in their own process and so getting the output available in a good way is still kind of an open problem
- Sometimes tests that shouldn't pass do, at least when having developed assay, because they run in another process. You should intentionally crash your test to make sure it's actually working, because you'll have tests pass that really shouldn't which frankly isn't great
- Rust Analyzer gets tripped up sometimes and the error propagates to each
invocation making it harder to track down. In these cases
cargo test
will let you know where the issue actually is - No work on spans yet! This macro just slaps things in and so error messages
are much to be desired without much in the way to tell you why an invocation
of
assay
fails. assay
does not work inside doc tests!