-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python script checkers #8
Conversation
b59caf1
to
c36f2e4
Compare
c36f2e4
to
cdee8e5
Compare
Do you want to merge this into develop or in your branch ? 🤔 |
I wanted to check if the PR would update to |
Alright :) However I think we should fix all the checks before merging into develop. How do you want to proceed ? |
As you wish really. I could change things still but as I'm not clear on the odds and ends, I could just break the code thinking I'm fixing it. |
a68781c
to
f8f556d
Compare
Here, less errors. |
d56ca02
to
fde34b2
Compare
f804f2d
to
dc8c2b3
Compare
dc8c2b3
to
704b11b
Compare
If this code is to last (and I think so), we better have some checks on it.
I've cleaned mostly aesthetic issues highlighted by the checks, however there remains:
merge_json
,run_cmd
,git_setup
)create_app_list/app_load_params_utils.py
file)build_and_tests
are performed throughdict.get
, meaning all the related variable could beNone
, which clearly is not the case given how they are manipulated. I was under the impression that the parsed JSON was under our control, and so that we could trust its content and drop thesedict.get
for classicdict[index]
access, but I'm not sure.create_app_list.app_load_params_check
create_app_list/main.py:61
:variant_json
is a list, whilemerge_json
accept dictionnaries. Not sure if it works (it seems to 🤷 ).