You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a problem with rose gold alloy.
there is a non-heated alloy manufacturing method where copper, gold, and rose gold are made in a 1:1:1 ratio,
and a heated method where it is made in a 1:1:2 ratio.
However, even if the burner is lit, if you pour it little by little (less than 111mb) by pipe or basic tank unit into a basin, it will be created in a non-heated manner. (1:1:1 ratio)
So, you need to automate it by first lighting the fire, then pour using a bucket, (more than 111mb at a time), and then putting it in through a pipe or something.
Solution(s)
So I think, At least if the burner is lit, I hope it can be made only by heating method.
Is your feature request related to a problem?
This is a problem with rose gold alloy.
there is a non-heated alloy manufacturing method where copper, gold, and rose gold are made in a 1:1:1 ratio,
and a heated method where it is made in a 1:1:2 ratio.
However, even if the burner is lit, if you pour it little by little (less than 111mb) by pipe or basic tank unit into a basin, it will be created in a non-heated manner. (1:1:1 ratio)
So, you need to automate it by first lighting the fire, then pour using a bucket, (more than 111mb at a time), and then putting it in through a pipe or something.
Solution(s)
So I think, At least if the burner is lit, I hope it can be made only by heating method.
Describe alternatives you've considered
or, I just thought about changing this to this.
Non-heated method (11:11:11 mb)
Heated method (111:111:222 mb)
->
Heated method (11:11:22 mb)
Non-heated method (111:111:111 mb)
Additional context
It may not seem like a big deal, but I think a lot of people don't know about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: