You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is due somehow to the aging of population. If we change
to-report calculate-age
report floor ((ticks - birth-tick) / ticks-per-year)
end
into
to-report calculate-age
report floor ((1 - birth-tick) / ticks-per-year)
end
The phenomenon goes away. See the figures from a run without crimes and without births
with age:
without age:
Is this ok? My opinion is that this is due to a slight increase in the number of people at risk, that only afterwards reduces - that is, due to population structure. But playing with the such population structure didn't convince me completely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is due somehow to the aging of population. If we change
into
The phenomenon goes away. See the figures from a run without crimes and without births
with age:
without age:
Is this ok? My opinion is that this is due to a slight increase in the number of people at risk, that only afterwards reduces - that is, due to population structure. But playing with the such population structure didn't convince me completely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: