Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uninteresting results - additional parameters? #7

Open
lynnyi opened this issue Oct 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Uninteresting results - additional parameters? #7

lynnyi opened this issue Oct 16, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@lynnyi
Copy link

lynnyi commented Oct 16, 2018

I ran the default python SAUCIE.py (default settings) on two datasets (with clustering and batch correction), which gave only "0.0" cluster annotation for all cells. The SAUCIE embedding was just a linear embedding of all the cells (pretty much on the y=x line). Are there additional parameters that must be tuned, i.e. the lambdas? What are they?

@mattamodio
Copy link
Collaborator

Hmm that could have a couple of different causes, but I think the range of the data is still the most likely culprit. What are the smallest and largest values in your cells(rows) x markers(columns) matrix? After log scaling, hopefully there are no numbers larger than 10-20?

The lambdas will affect the number of clusters identified, but if the embedding is close to the y=x line, that is more likely to come from data being outside of the [-10,10] range.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants