Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CommonMarkAdditionalFeatures like tables #42

Open
yufeih opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #111
Open

CommonMarkAdditionalFeatures like tables #42

yufeih opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #111
Labels

Comments

@yufeih
Copy link

yufeih commented Aug 25, 2015

In addition to the strike through syntax, are there any plains to support more additional features, specifically tables as described here?

@Knagis
Copy link
Owner

Knagis commented Aug 31, 2015

There are no current plans for myself to implement any additional features that are not in the spec since there are pending work from the recent spec versions that require work.

However if someone would create a PR for the github table syntax that does not have negative performance impact to base scenario (parsing without any additional features) then I would gladly include it.

@ratishphilip
Copy link

@Knagis
Hi,
First of all, this is an awesome project. Great work!
Just wanted to know if there is any possibility of including the tables feature in the near future.

@Knagis
Copy link
Owner

Knagis commented Apr 26, 2016

My answer hasn't really changed since last august...

There have been some work on the tables though that you might find useful:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants