A typechecker plugin that can disambiguate "obvious" uses of effects when using
in-other-words
.
Consider the following program:
foo :: Eff (State Int) m => m ()
foo = put 10
What does this program do? Any human will tell you that it changes the state of
the Int
to 10, which is clearly what's meant.
Unfortunately, in-other-words
can't work this out on its own. Its reasoning is
"maybe you wanted to change some other State
effect which is also a Num
,
but you just forgot to add some Eff
/s
constraints for it."
This is obviously insane, but it's the way the cookie crumbles.
in-other-words-plugin
is a typechecker plugin which will disambiguate the above
program (and others) so the compiler will do what you want.
Add the following line to your package configuration:
ghc-options: -fplugin=Control.Effect.Plugin
in-other-words-plugin
will only disambiguate effects if there is exactly one
relevant constraint in scope. For example, it will not disambiguate the
following program:
bar :: Effs '[ State Int
, State Double
] m
=> m ()
bar = put 10
because it is now unclear whether you're attempting to set the Int
or the
Double
. Instead, you can manually write a type application in this case.
bar :: Effs '[ State Int
, State Double
] m
=> m ()
bar = put @Int 10
This plugin and this README is copied almost verbatim from
polysemy-plugin
,
which itself is copied almost verbatim from simple-effects
.