Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add 2nd-order Runge Kutta for RF excitation #201

Open
beorostica opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #458
Open

Add 2nd-order Runge Kutta for RF excitation #201

beorostica opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #458
Assignees
@cncastillo
Labels
1) high priority core enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@beorostica
Copy link
Contributor

beorostica commented Oct 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

In the current state of the code, the RFs use a zero-order-hold interpolation, which must be changed to a linear interpolation instead.

The idea is that the waveforms of both RFs and Grads must have the same kind of interpretarion.

This issue should address the problem of #200 and it is related with #167.
@cncastillo cncastillo reopened this Sep 2, 2024
@cncastillo cncastillo changed the title Change RF interpretation to linear interpolation Add 2nd-order Runge Kutta for RF excitation Sep 2, 2024
@cncastillo cncastillo mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2024
Open
@cncastillo cncastillo linked a pull request Sep 2, 2024 that will close this issue
Trapezoidal rule for RFs #458
Draft
@cncastillo cncastillo self-assigned this Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cncastillo cncastillo

Labels
1) high priority core enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Trapezoidal rule for RFs JuliaHealth/KomaMRI.jl
2 participants
@cncastillo @beorostica