Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Fit models with standard for loop + notebook on training loops. #382

Open
daniel-dodd opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers no-stale stale

Comments

@daniel-dodd
Copy link
Member

daniel-dodd commented Sep 6, 2023

We have a convenient fit function to train GPs against objectives. It would be good though e.g., in the regression notebook to show a simple python for loop, and a simple lax.scan training loop, to demonstrate that users can write their own training loops. Give insight to, eg., the ConjugateMLL is something you can take jax.grad against and just do gradient descent on.

Then it would be good to link this to a more extensive notebook exposing users to stoping gradients, bijectors transformations etc, and show how to add a training bar to the loop.

@daniel-dodd daniel-dodd added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers labels Sep 6, 2023
Copy link

There has been no recent activity on this issue. To keep our issues log clean, we remove old and inactive issues.
Please update to the latest version of GPJax and check if that resolves the issue. Let us know if that works for you by leaving a comment.
This issue is now marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe that this is incorrect, please comment. Thank you!

Copy link

There has been no recent activity on this issue. To keep our issues log clean, we remove old and inactive issues.
Please update to the latest version of GPJax and check if that resolves the issue. Let us know if that works for you by leaving a comment.
This issue is now marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe that this is incorrect, please comment. Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers no-stale stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants