You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I do the localization after finishing the map, sometimes the locobot will miss its location. Then the costmap cannot match the static map. According to what I know, it is because that the Rtabmap's localization is only base on the camera data. If I want the LOCOBOT to correct the odom with Lidar, could I use AMCL to make it? And how can I implement it. (What packages should I include except the AMCL?)
Sometimes the locobot can position itself well with rtabmap. I really like it. I still want to to know how can I improve the success rate.
When I am running the locobot, it might have an accumulation of Z - axis positions. I can show you the tf tree and the issue here. It will not affect the program but I want to know why and how to fix it.
Thanks in advance
Robot Model
locobot_base
Operating System
Ubuntu 20.04
ROS Version
ROS 1 Noetic
Additional Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current solutions are as follows, I don't know if they are correct and efficient.
For the problem1, what I can do is just running the locobot somewhere randomly and hope it can find the position. So, I wonder may I use AMCL to do this part.
For the problem2, I can restart the locobot's base to reset the odom of create3, then it will go back to the ground.
Question
Hi there,
Sometimes the locobot can position itself well with rtabmap. I really like it. I still want to to know how can I improve the success rate.
Thanks in advance
Robot Model
locobot_base
Operating System
Ubuntu 20.04
ROS Version
ROS 1 Noetic
Additional Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: