You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regarding the access pattern of matrix A, I have a question:
When data is transferred from global memory to shared memory, swizzling is applied.
During the ldmatrix operation, each thread retrieves the corresponding address required by ldmatrix, ensuring that no bank conflicts occur in any transaction.
For example, thread 0 reads from the 0th position in shared memory, thread 1 reads from the 9th position, thread 2 reads from the 18th position, and so on. Threads 0 to 7 access different banks, which avoids bank conflicts. The content accessed by these 8 threads corresponds to the 8 vertical rows in global memory (highlighted in light blue).
Up to this point, I understand the process and appreciate the cleverness of the swizzling technique. However, the issue arises when thread 8 accesses the content 257, which is not aligned with the same column as the blocks accessed by threads 0 to 7.
According to the diagram in the documentation, threads 0 to 7 should access the top-left block, threads 8 to 15 should access the top-right block, threads 16 to 23 the bottom-left, and threads 24 to 31 the bottom-right.
However, based on the logs I printed, threads 0 to 7 are accessing the top-left block, threads 8 to 15 the bottom-right block, threads 16 to 23 the top-right block, and threads 24 to 31 the bottom-left block. With such access patterns, the data retrieved by ldmatrix is likely incorrect.
Where might the issue lie? Is there something wrong with my understanding? I'm very confused.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Regarding the access pattern of matrix A, I have a question:
For example,
thread 0
reads from the0th
position in shared memory,thread 1
reads from the9th
position,thread 2
reads from the18th
position, and so on. Threads 0 to 7 access different banks, which avoids bank conflicts. The content accessed by these 8 threads corresponds to the 8 vertical rows in global memory (highlighted in light blue).Up to this point, I understand the process and appreciate the cleverness of the swizzling technique. However, the issue arises when
thread 8
accesses the content 257, which is not aligned with the same column as the blocks accessed by threads 0 to 7.According to the diagram in the documentation, threads 0 to 7 should access the top-left block, threads 8 to 15 should access the top-right block, threads 16 to 23 the bottom-left, and threads 24 to 31 the bottom-right.
However, based on the logs I printed, threads 0 to 7 are accessing the top-left block, threads 8 to 15 the bottom-right block, threads 16 to 23 the top-right block, and threads 24 to 31 the bottom-left block. With such access patterns, the data retrieved by ldmatrix is likely incorrect.
Where might the issue lie? Is there something wrong with my understanding? I'm very confused.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: