Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAQ: updating certain packages while a kernel is running is going to break the installation/fail #32

Open
jankatins opened this issue May 17, 2016 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@jankatins
Copy link
Contributor

If update.packages touches a native package which is loaded, it will fail and leave the package in a weired state (at least if I use R CMD build in my local git).

This is not a problem unless that that package is jsonlite, which the kernel needs... In that case you need to shutdown all kernels and then reinstall jsonlite...

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

Is this a Windows issue with multiple processes trying to open the same file?

@jankatins
Copy link
Contributor Author

jankatins commented May 17, 2016

No, I think it is a problem with native code (= *.so on linux) trying to be replaced while in use.

@jankatins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe it would be interesting to replace update.packages with a version which checks if one of the to-be-updated packages are in a "blacklist" and if so errors instead of crashing...?

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

I feel like we don't understand the problem well enough, and I'm wary of attempting to paper over bugs in R package installation - that's the kind of fix that can end up causing as much aggravation as the problem it aims to resolve.

@jankatins
Copy link
Contributor Author

true...

BTW: I looked into the Rsession process of rstudio and they use rcp messages to communicate between the UI and the session... Not sure how easy it would be to translate the jupyter messages to rstudio messages and then use their rsession as the backend for the kernel... would remove a lot of headache from our usage of evaluate...

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Member

well, i guess that would be a separate project then.

i think a hard dependency on RStudio is out of scope for this

@jankatins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep, the last would a replacement for our current evaluate based implementation...

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Member

i’ve added most FAQ entries, but it’s not clear if we should really add this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants