Is 'informed consent identification code' really a 'data item'?

[yongqunh]

The ICO term 'informed consent identification code' (ICO_0000044) is currently under 'data item'. Is it really a 'data item'?

@cstoeckert mentions that this should be an information content entity (ICE), but may not ba a data item since data item is for real data, and the informed consent identification code differs somehow.

See a similar DUO issue:
EBISPOT/DUO#3

This issue was raised out of a joint DUO and ICO meeting on 2/23/2017.

[linikujp]

Agree. Where shall it go then. Please advice.

…

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Yongqun Oliver He < ***@***.***> wrote: The ICO term 'informed consent identification code' (ICO_0000044) is currently under 'data item'. Is it really a 'data item'? @cstoeckert <https://github.com/cstoeckert> mentions that this should be an information content entity (ICE), but may not ba a data item since data item is for real data, and the informed consent identification code differs somehow. See a similar DUO issue: EBISPOT/DUO#3 <EBISPOT/DUO#3> This issue was raised out of a joint DUO and ICO meeting on 2/23/2017. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AITyPXQ47MhMBcyS1fzzw9pz3J2Zr31_ks5rfbWUgaJpZM4MKMXZ> .

[cstoeckert]

See also Tracker item 2

[cstoeckert]

Related to this is the DUO consent code http://www.ontobee.org/ontology/DUO?iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DUO_0000001
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005772

[mbrochhausen]

The definition is: "a data item that shows a unique identification code for an informed consent". It is not clear what this class is intended to represent.

[mbrochhausen]

The consent codes represented by DUO (probably these are examples thereof: http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure/image?size=large&id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005772.t001) are not data items. They are related to claims and obligation (or directive information content entities.

[mbrochhausen]

Also, we need to revisit 'informed consent rule specification'. It looks like a class that was created before d-acts was adopted and it will clash or at least provide double representation once we use d-acts in full swing.